Fabel5
Task authoring and evaluation against a working engineer's judgement rather than a checklist.
Contractual engineering for the organisations leading the field, including Anthropic, OpenAI and Gemini. Six continuous months across three models, trained with advanced reinforcement learning techniques and reviewed against each team’s own quality bar.
Three programmes, six months
Task authoring and evaluation against a working engineer's judgement rather than a checklist.
Engineering work delivered to spec, reviewed and iterated against real model behaviour.
Continuous contribution across the programme, scaled up and down as the work required.
Four steps, no lock-in
You describe the work. We say plainly what we can take on and what we cannot.
A small piece delivered first, so both sides see the standard before committing.
Continuous contribution at an agreed rate, reviewed against your own quality bar.
Widen the engagement or wind it down. No lock-in either way.
Engineering delivered under contract to model teams: the tasks that need a working engineer's judgement rather than a checklist, and the evaluation work that shows whether an output is actually better.
Over the last six months our work has covered the Fabel5, Mythos and Gemini programmes, across authoring, review and evaluation.
Short scoped engagements or a continuing arrangement. Tell us the shape of the work and we will say what we can take on and when.
Tell us the shape of it. We will say what we can take on, at what rate, and when we could start.